New RTI and PRO CONTROL (herein referred to as “RTI”) branded remotes, switches, interfaces, processors, expansion devices, audio distribution systems, accessories, chargers, or parts therefor (“Products”), and repair services performed by RTI or its authorized service providers (“Services”) are warranted by RTI to its end users through authorized dealers and distributors for the duration of the Warranty Period, as set forth below.
#Rti checkers free#
Although distributors or dealers are free to supplement, extend or expand these warranties to customers or end-users as they see fit, RTI’s warranty is limited to the provisions set forth below.
We would like to point out that the disclosure of the identity of Examiners is in the least interest of the general public and also any attempt to reveal the examiner’s identity will give rise to dire consequences.Subject to any specific terms set forth in the respective distributor or dealer agreement, Remote Technologies Incorporated (“RTI”) provides the following limited warranty to its end users on purchases made directly from RTI, or an authorized RTI dealer. Noting that the information seeker had no role to play in this, the bench said “We don’t see any logical reason as to how this will benefit him or the public at large.
Therefore, any information shared between them is not liable to be disclosed,” the top court ruled. As a result, a fiduciary relationship is established between the PSC and the Examiners. “Examiners in the position of agents are bound to evaluate the answer papers as per the instructions given by the PSC. Kerala and Allahabad high courts had ruled that no fiduciary relationship existed between PSC and candidates appearing for examination and, therefore, the information sought for had to be supplied to them.īut the court clarified that the relationship between the commission and examiners was fiduciary in nature which required to be protected. Since the implementation of RTI Act in 2005, candidates have been seeking copies of their evaluated answer sheets and other related information from universities and public service commissions.
This practice will ensure a fair play in this competitive environment, where candidate puts his time in preparing for the competitive exams,” it said agreeing with the HC on the question. “Disclosing the marks and the answer sheets to the candidates will ensure that the candidates have been given marks according to their performance in the exam. The bench, however, said there was nothing wrong in furnishing scanned copies of answer-sheet, tabulation sheet and other information to candidates. “In our considered opinion, revealing (an) examiner’s identity will only lead to confusion and public unrest, a bench of Justice MY Eqbal and Justice Arun Mishra said reversing a Kerala High Court decision on this point. The Supreme Court ruled on Thursday ruled that names of examiners of answer sheets can’t be disclosed to a candidate under the Right to Information Act, saying revealing an examiner’s identity could have serious consequences for him.
0 kommentar(er)
