Despite the apparent technical advantages of its sensor, real world advantages are pretty slim. However, don’t think the X-T4 is miles ahead of the A6600.
The A6600 uses a traditional Bayer array. Shot on Sony A6600 David Elrich / Digital TrendsĪdditionally, the X-T4 uses Fujifilm’s more complex X-Trans filter array, which can increase sharpness by foregoing an anti-aliasing filter without the usual increased risk of moiré (the rainbow-like false colors that can appear when photographing very fine patterns, like those in some fabrics). It also features a faster readout speed which leads to improvements when using the electronic shutter (more on that in the video section). The X-T4’s is of a newer, backside-illuminated (BSI) design which increases light sensitivity. That’s not say that these sensors are equal, however. At a glance: Fujifilm X-T4īoth of these cameras use APS-C sensors with a 1.5X crop factor compared to full-frame, and while the X-T4 has a slight edge in resolution, nobody is going to notice those extra 2 megapixels. Here’s what you need to know if you’re deciding between these two cameras - but truth be told, you can’t really go wrong. Sony’s autofocus remains unbeatable, however, and the A6600 is now selling for quite a bit less than the X-T4, making it a great buy. Both are excellent cameras, but the Fujifilm has a few advantages for experienced enthusiasts, from a greater shutter speed range to higher-quality video. More than ever before, Fujifilm’s new X-T4 takes Sony head-on, putting the powerful A6600 to the test. The companies targeted different customers, and their products were fine living in their respective bubbles. Fitbit Versa 3Ī few years ago, you picked Sony if you liked high-tech gadgets with fast performance, and Fujifilm if you were a more traditional photographer who preferred a slower, methodical approach to image making but still wanted high-quality results.
0 kommentar(er)
